Answer:
D
Explanation:
Request a hearing before the real estate commission
2. Paraphrase Explain the meaning of these lines from part 27
of In Memoriam: "Tis better to have loved and lost / Than
never to have loved at all."
Answer:
It is preferable to have loved and lost than to have never loved.
Explanation:
^^^
Sheriff Diamond’s proposal to create a county-wide multijurisdictional communications center was an unusual idea in law enforcement communications.
True
False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The correct answer is False. The development of communications services that serve multiple law enforcement and emergency service responders in a county, region, or state is growing increasingly common.
BUSINESS LAW 1-
Sally had a checking account at Wayne Bank. Wayne Bank sent her special checks that she could use
to draw on a line of credit (short term loan). When Sally used these checks, Wayne Bank did not
take money our of her checking account; instead, it treated the checks as loans and charged her
interest. The interest rate was not apparent from the face of the check. When Sally wrote checks,
Wayne Bank sold them to Wolfe. Were the checks negotiable instruments? Explain your answer.
No, the checks were Negotiable Instruments. The checks did not meet the requirement of unconditionality.
What are the principles of negotiability?The six principles of negotiability are as follows:
It must be documented in writing.The creator or drawer must sign it.It must be an unconditional commitment or payment order.It must be for a certain monetary sum.It must be paid on demand or at a specific time.Unless it is a check, it must be made payable to the order or bearer.In this case, the check did not meet the requirement of unconditionality. They served her the check based on the condition or terms of a loan.
A negotiable instrument is defined by the UCC as an unconditioned document that promises or directs the payment of a specified amount of money. The two types of instruments are drafts and notes. A draft is a document that directs the payment of money. A check is an example.
Technically, they are also called convenience checks.
A convenience check can be used in the same way as a personal check, but when you write one, the money is deducted from the credit card's line of credit. If you wish to use a convenience check to make a purchase, simply make a check out to the merchant for the amount of your transaction and sign it.
Learn more about Convenience Checks:
https://brainly.com/question/10733776
#SPJ1
4. State one (1) difference between political participation and political contestation.
5. State any two (2) benefits of monitoring and evaluation in the public policy process?
6. State two (2) 3rd generation theories in public policy implementation.
7. Give any two (2) differences between parliamentary and presidential democracies
According to empirical data, having a better understanding of politics helps people develop more stable and consistent political attitudes, further their own interests, and make decisions that are consistent with their values and preferences.
The required details for political participation and political contestation in given paragraph
It also encourages support for democratic values and fosters confidence in the political system. Political involvement encompasses a wide range of actions by which people form and express their ideas about the world and its governance, as well as attempt to influence and participate in decisions that have an impact on their lives. According to the dictionary, contestation is a "social practice [that] comprises resistance to particular concerns that matter to people."
People can form and express their thoughts on the world and its governance through a wide variety of political participation-related activities.
To know about political participation and political contestation in given link
https://brainly.com/question/1323955
#SPJ9
Find a court case and discuss how pretrial motions were used by the defendant.
Answer:
Common pre-trial motions include: Motion to Dismiss – an attempt to get the judge to dismiss a charge or the case. This may be done if there is not enough evidence, if the alleged facts do not amount to a crime. Motion to Suppress – an attempt to keep certain statements or evidence from being introduced as evidence.
Explanation:
Responding to or filing motions is one of the last actions a prosecutor takes pretrial. A motion is an application to the court made by the prosecutor or defence lawyer asking the court to rule on a particular issue prior to the trial. The court, defendants, witnesses, evidence, or trial all may be impacted by the motion.
What are some common pre-trial motions?A motion to dismiss is made in an effort to have the case or charge dismissed by the judge. If there is insufficient evidence or if the alleged facts do not constitute a crime, this may be done.
A motion to suppress is an effort to prevent the introduction of certain testimony or evidence as evidence. For instance, it might be possible to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of a search conducted by the police without a warrant.
Motions for venue changes may be submitted for a number of reasons, including trial publicity. To protect the defendant's right to an impartial jury, it might be necessary to move the trial to another location if the local news has extensively covered the case.
Learn more about pretrials motions
https://brainly.com/question/13054707
#SPJ9
aggressive driving behavior, such as speeding and rapid acceleration and braking, can lower your gas mileage by up to what highway speeds.
Answer:
Aggressive driving (speeding, rapid acceleration, and braking) wastes gasoline. It can lower your gasoline mileage by 33% at highway speeds and by 5% around town. Sensible driving is also safer for you and others, so you may save more than money.
Explanation:
In many states, a plaintiff who willingly enters a dangerous situation and is injured will be barred from recovery even if the dangerous condition is not his fault. True or false?.
This is true. In the law of tort if a person goes ahead to willing enter into a dangerous situation then they would not be liable to getting any forms of recovery.
What is a recovery?This is the term that is used to refer to the compensation that the person who is suing another person for an injury or any other forms of grievances is to get.
The person would not get this here based on the circumstances that surrounds the issues here. They had known the effects of the action but they also willing entered into it. Hence they would not get a recovery
Read more on recovery here: https://brainly.com/question/14980437
#SPJ1
What are the differences between the democrat party and the Republic party?
On important topics including taxes, the role of government, entitlements (such as Social Security and Medicare), gun control, immigration, healthcare, abortion, and environmental policy and regulation, the Democratic and Republican parties differ.
What viewpoints does the Democratic Party hold?The Democratic Party, whose emblem is a donkey, is typically associated with left-leaning, liberal, and progressive ideological ideas. As a result, it supports strong government regulation of businesses and support for American citizens. Thus, Democrats emphasize social responsibility as one of their core ideals.
What principles does the Republican Party uphold?Libertarianism, social conservatism, and economic conservatism are just a few examples of the right-leaning ideologies that the Republican Party is known for advocating. Republicans therefore typically embrace traditional values, little government meddling, and strong private sector support.
What distinguishes the republican party from the democratic party?The disparities between Democratic and Republican party stances and policies on important topics like taxes, the role of government, entitlements (such as Social Security and Medicare), gun control, immigration, healthcare, abortion, and environmental regulation. Although these two parties control the majority of the political scene in America, their ideologies and ideals are very dissimilar.
Learn more about Democratic and Republican party: https://brainly.com/question/12539017
#SPJ13
Explain how common law was imposed on the commonwealth countries.
The common law was imposed on the Commonwealth countries where the vast majority of legal systems in the Commonwealth were founded on English common law.
The common law is considered to be the law which is declared by the judges, derived from precedent and custom. Thus, it is said to originate with the legal reforms of King Henry II in the 12th century and was called “common” because it tend to apply equally across the whole country.
So, it is said that the vast majority of legal systems in the Commonwealth are founded on English common law. Where it is purely not the case, the system is applied in interlocked or parallel with other legal systems.
Hence, the English common law originated in the early Middle Ages.
To learn more about the common law here:
https://brainly.com/question/8476406
#SPJ1
Which of the following should be used to find to help you find cases that have
construed and defined terms, words, and phrases, whether those are legal terms
or everyday terms?
The following should be used to find to help you find cases that have construed and defined terms, words, and phrases, whether those are legal terms or everyday terms American Law Reports.
Which three principles govern the interpretation of statutes?The "Intention of Parliament" must be carried out in the construction (interpretation) of statutes, and the English courts created three primary guidelines (plus a few minor ones) to help them in this endeavor. The golden rule, the literal rule, and the mischief rule were these.
What kind of cases has the Supreme Court initial jurisdiction over?The Supreme Court is the first and only Court to consider a case, which is referred to as original jurisdiction. The Constitution restricts matters with original jurisdiction to those involving disagreements between states or among ambassadors and other high-ranking ministers.
To Know more about American Law
https://brainly.com/question/16389471
#SPJ13
Why are positive rights more controversial than negative rights
Positive rights are more controversial than negative rights because the only requirement for following negative rights is that we refrain from meddling with one another. But, positive rights are contentious since they demand that we be provided with commodities and services at the expense of other people.
A negative right is used to limit the activities that other people or governments can do toward or against the right holder. On the contrary, positive rights give the bearer of the right the ability to make a claim against the other person or the government for a particular good, service or plan of action.
Positive rights lean towards the idea of "doctrine of entitlements" which holds that certain individuals are entitled to things that other people have worked hard for. This doctrine holds that people owe others a portion—or even their entire lives—by virtue of their nature and enforceable responsibility. If people have such positive rights, no one can justify refusing to serve others. This is why positive rights are more controversial than negative rights.
To know more about rights refer:
https://brainly.com/question/1297903
#SPJ1