The general solution for the differential equation: -2ty 4e^-t^2 is y = √(π^3) * e^(t^2) * erf(t).
To find the general solution of the given differential equation, we'll use the method of integrating factors. The differential equation is:
-2ty + 4e^(-t^2) = 0
To solve this, we can rewrite the equation in standard form:
y' + (-2t)y = 4e^(-t^2)
The integrating factor (denoted as μ) for this differential equation is given by:
μ = e^(∫(-2t) dt) = e^(-t^2)
Now, we'll multiply both sides of the equation by the integrating factor:
e^(-t^2)y' + (-2t)e^(-t^2)y = 4e^(-t^2)e^(-t^2)
Simplifying this equation, we get:
(d/dt)(e^(-t^2)y) = 4e^(-2t^2)
Now, we can integrate both sides with respect to t:
∫(d/dt)(e^(-t^2)y) dt = ∫4e^(-2t^2) dt
Integrating the left side yields:
e^(-t^2)y = ∫4e^(-2t^2) dt
The integral on the right side is not easily solvable in terms of elementary functions. However, we can express the solution using the error function (erf), which is a special function often used in the context of integrating Gaussian distributions. The integral can be rewritten as:
e^(-t^2)y = 2√π * ∫e^(-2t^2) dt = 2√π * ∫e^(-t^2) e^(-t^2) dt
This integral can be expressed in terms of the error function:
e^(-t^2)y = 2√π * (1/2) * √(π/2) * erf(t)
Simplifying further:
e^(-t^2)y = √(π^3) * erf(t)
Finally, solving for y:
y = √(π^3) * e^(t^2) * erf(t)
Therefore, the general solution of the given differential equation is:
y = √(π^3) * e^(t^2) * erf(t)
To learn more about differential equation, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1164377
#SPJ11
Complete the remainder of the table for the given function rule: y = 2x + 4
Answer:
eight.
Step-by-step explanation:
2(6) ÷ 3
12÷3
4+4
8
Suppose that you used technology to find the least-squares regression line from a table of values for two variables and the results were displayed as follows.
m = -0.03576 b = 42.17093 r^2 = 0.8914 r = -0.9438
What can we say about the relationship between the two variables?
Since the r-value is quite close to -1 (only 0.0562 away), we can conclude that the two variables are strongly negatively associated. This implies that when one variable increases, the other variable decreases.
In statistics, the correlation coefficient is used to quantify the linear relationship between two variables. The r-value ranges from -1 to 1, indicating the degree to which the variables are positively or negatively associated.
The r-value measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. It ranges from -1 to 1.
The closer the r-value is to -1, the stronger and more negative the correlation is.
The closer the r-value is to 1, the stronger and more positive the correlation is.
A value of 0 indicates that there is no linear relationship between the variables.In this case, the r-value is -0.9438.
Because the r-value is negative, the two variables are negatively associated. The closer the r-value is to -1, the stronger the negative association is.
Learn more about correlation coefficient at:
https://brainly.com/question/24443084
#SPJ11
Three coffees and two muffins cost a total of $7. Two
coffees and four muffins cost $8.
Let x = cost of coffees
Let y = cost of muffins
how do i write this in a system of linear equations?
Step-by-step explanation:
3 coffees + 2 muffins = $7
therefore,
[tex]3x + 2y = 7[/tex]
2 coffees + 4 muffins = $8
therefore,
[tex]2x + 4y = 8[/tex]
Answer:
i think in every coast we're adding two shillings in the first sentence the total was 5 and we paid $7 and in the second sentence the total was 8 dollars meaning we added to shillings.
Step-by-step explanation:
in my school we are taughtthat we shouldn't mix goats with sheeps so we this the same way we can't mix x and y so in my opinion I guess you can say x + y =to that amount of money at the end you paid if it's 8 dollars or 7 dollars. we can say x represents the coffees and y represents the muffins that's how I get it I hope you want to be angry with me. for example 3 + 2 equals to 7 .3 + 2 is 5 so we'll carry five to the other side of equals where we will make it be minus so we'll say 7 - 5 where will get 2
Construct a confidence interval for p₁-P2 at the given level of confidence. x₁ =354. n₁ =545, x2 #406, n₂ = 596, 95% confidence The researchers are % confident the difference between the two population proportions. P₁ P2, is between and (Use ascending order. Type an integer or decimal rounded to three decimal places as needed).
To find the confidence interval for p1 - p2 at a given level of confidence 95%, with x1 = 354, n1 = 545, x2 = 406, n2 = 596, we need to first calculate the point estimate for the difference in proportions:
$$\hat{p_1} = \frac{x_1} {n_1} = \frac {354}{545} \approx. 0.6495$$$$\hat{p_2} = \frac{x_2} {n_2} = \frac {406}{596} \approx. 0.6822$$
Therefore, the point estimate of the difference in proportions is: $$\hat{p_1} - \hat{p_2} = 0.6495 - 0.6822 \approx. -0.0327$$. Now, we can use the formula for the confidence interval for the difference in proportions:
$$\text{Confidence interval} = (\hat{p_1} - \hat{p_2}) \pm z_{\alpha/2} \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p_1}(1 - \hat{p_1})}{n_1} + \frac{\hat{p_2}(1 - \hat{p_2})}{n_2}}$$where z_{\alpha/2} is the z-score for the level of confidence 95% (or 0.95), which is approximately 1.96
Using this information, the confidence interval for p1 - p2 at a 95% level of confidence is: $$(0.6495 - 0.6822) \pm 1.96 \sqrt {\frac {0.6495(1 - 0.6495)}{545} + \frac {0.6822(1 - 0.6822)}{596}}$$$$\approx. -0.0327 \pm 0.0472$$
Therefore, we can conclude that the researchers are 95% confident the difference between the two population proportions, P1 - P2, is between -0.080 and -0.004 (using ascending order and rounding to three decimal places as needed).
To know more about decimal refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28372533
#SPJ11
2x + y = 2
x – 2y = -4
what is x and y?
Answer:
x = 0
y = 2
Step-by-step explanation:
2x + y = 2 (Multiply by 2)
x – 2y = -4
4x + 2y = 4
x – 2y = -4
5x = 0
x = 0
2x + y = 2
2(0) + y = 2
0 + y = 2
y = 2
A sample of 20 students who have taken a statistics exam at ZZ University, shows a mean = = 72 and variance s² 16 at the exam grades. Assume that grades are distributed normally, find a %98 confidence interval for the variance of all student's grades.
A 98% confidence interval for the variance of all student's grades is [9.41, 31.41].
The degrees of freedom (df) are (n - 1) = (20 - 1) = 19.
A confidence interval is given by the formula: $[{\chi }_{\frac{\alpha }{2},(n-1)}^{2}\frac{s^{2}}{d_f},\ { \chi }_{1-\frac{\alpha }{2},(n-1)}^{2}\frac{s^{2}}{d_f}]$ where ${\chi }_{\frac{\alpha }{2},(n-1)}^{2}$ is the lower percentile of the chi-square distribution with (n - 1) degrees of freedom, ${ \chi }_{1-\frac{\alpha }{2},(n-1)}^{2}$ is the upper percentile of the chi-square distribution with (n - 1) degrees of freedom, and s² is the sample variance.
Lower percentile (L.P) = ${\chi }_{\frac{\alpha }{2},(n-1)}^{2}\frac{s^{2}}{d_f}$
Upper percentile (U.P) = ${ \chi }_{1-\frac{\alpha }{2},(n-1)}^{2}\frac{s^{2}}{d_f}$
Now, α = 0.02, n = 20, s² = 16, and df = 19.
Lower percentile:L.P = ${\chi }_{\frac{\alpha }{2},(n-1)}^{2}\frac{s^{2}}{d_f} = { \chi }_{\frac{0.02}{2},19}^{2}\frac{16}{19} = 9.410$
Upper percentile:U.P = ${ \chi }_{1-\frac{\alpha }{2},(n-1)}^{2}\frac{s^{2}}{d_f} = { \chi }_{1-\frac{0.02}{2},19}^{2}\frac{16}{19} = 31.410$
To know more about degrees of freedom, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31178740
#SPJ11
The 98% confidence interval for the variance of all student's grades is (10.12, 30.29). Hence, option A is the correct answer.
Given data are: The sample size, n is 20, the mean of the sample is 72 and the variance of the sample, s² is 16.
Option A is the correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation: Given, Sample size, n = 20
Mean of the sample, [tex]\bar x = 72[/tex]
Variance of the sample, [tex]s^{2} =16[/tex].
We have to find a 98% confidence interval for the variance of all student's grades.
Assumption: Grades are distributed normally.
So, the formula for the confidence interval for the variance is: [tex]((n-1)s^{2} / \chi^{2} \alpha /2, (n-1)s^{2} / \chi^{2} 1-\alpha /2)[/tex]
Where, [tex]\alpha = 1-0.98[/tex]
= 0.02
n-1 = 19
Degrees of freedom [tex]\chi^{2}\alpha /2[/tex] and [tex]\chi^{2}²1-\alpha /2[/tex] are the critical values of chi-square distribution with (n-1) degrees of freedom.
From the chi-square distribution table, we can find the values of [tex]\chi^{2}\alpha /2[/tex] and [tex]\chi^{2}²1-\alpha /2[/tex] such that the area between these values is 0.98.
Here, [tex]\alpha = 0.02[/tex] (as 98% confidence interval)
[tex]\alpha /2 = 0.02/2[/tex]
= 0.01
Using the above values, we get,
[tex]\chi^{2}0.01/2,19 = 8.907[/tex] and
[tex]\chi^{2}1-0.01/2,19 = 32.852[/tex]
Now, using the formula of confidence interval for the variance, we get,
[tex]((n-1)s^{2} / \chi^{2} \alpha /2, (n-1)s^{2} / \chi^{2} 1-\alpha /2)=((20-1) \times 16 / 32.852, (20-1) \times 16 / 8.907)[/tex]
We get, (10.12, 30.29).
Therefore, the 98% confidence interval for the variance of all student's grades is (10.12, 30.29). Hence, option A is the correct answer.
To know more about confidence interval, visit
https://brainly.com/question/14222862
#SPJ11
Performance Task: Super Survey Simulator
A performance task is a learning activity that asks students to perform to demonstrate their knowledge, understanding and proficiency.
What is a performance task?Your information is incomplete. Therefore, an overview will be given. A performance task measure whether a student can apply his or her knowledge to make sense of a new phenomenon.
It should be noted that performance tasks yield a tangible product and performance that serve as evidence of learning.
Learn more about performance on:
https://brainly.com/question/1532968
#SPJ1
pleaaaaseeeeeee help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
brainliest and 20 points
Answer:
x=0
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Short answer: Empty set ∅
if x is less than -1 then it can't be greater than 1
carol is making baby blankets for her daughters twins. If one blanket needs 43/4 yd of fabric, how much fabric does carol need for two blankets?
Answer:
21 1/2 yd
Step-by-step explanation:
43/4 + 43/4 = 21 1/2 yd
What is the simplified form of the following expression? Assume y does not equal 0. 3 square root 12x^2 over 16y
Answer:
Ok y does not = 0 (They say this because is y=0 it would be undefined anything divided by 0 is undefined)
[tex](3\sqrt{12x^2})/16y\\[/tex]
Answer: [tex](3x\sqrt{3})/8y[/tex]
is 700 yards bigger then 2000 feet?
Answer:
Yes, 700 yards bigger than 2000 feet because 700 yards = 2100 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
There are 3 feet in a yard, so that means we need to multiply 700 yards by 3 to get the number of feet there are in 700 yards.
700 yards × 3 feet = 2100 feet
700 yards = 2100 feet
2100 feet > 2000 feet
Answer:
Yes!
Step-by-step explanation:
700 yards is equal to 2100 feet, making it 100 feet longer.
heLp pls sOmeBoDy and tyy
Answer :
AB = 48.88
Step-by-step explanation:
We will use the sin fulmera
[tex] \frac{ \sin(134°) }{ab} = \frac{ \sin(18°) }{21} \\ \\ ab = 48.88[/tex]
I hope that is useful for you :)
Answer:
48.9
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex]\frac{A}{sinA}=\frac{B}{sinB} =\frac{C}{sinC}[/tex] (you can flip the equation around)
[tex]\frac{21}{sin18} = \frac{AB}{sin134}[/tex]
[tex]AB=\frac{21*134}{sin18}= 48.88448235[/tex]
Sorry for the late answer I was distracted
(q8) Find the volume of the solid obtained by rotating the region bounded by
, and the x-axis about the y axis.
The correct option is:d.9/2 pie units cubbed. The given region is obtained by rotating the curve y = x2 – 3 about the x-axis, which can be represented as:y = x² - 3
We have to rotate this curve around the y-axis. The required volume can be obtained by integrating the area of the circular cross-sections formed after rotating the curve.The radius of each circular cross-section at any value of x is equal to the perpendicular distance between the curve and the y-axis, which is x.
Thus, the area of each circular cross-section can be represented as:A = π(x²)The limits of integration can be found by equating y = x² - 3 to 0, which is:0 = x² - 3x = ± √3
Thus, the volume of the solid obtained by rotating the region bounded by y = x² - 3 and the x-axis about the y-axis is given by:V = ∫-√3^√3 π(x²) dxV = π ∫-√3^√3 (x²) dx.
By using the formula for integration, we get:V = π [(x³)/3] -√3^√3V = π [(√3³ - (-√3)³)/3]V = π (18/3)V = 6π.Therefore, the volume of the solid obtained by rotating the region bounded by y = x² - 3 and the x-axis about the y-axis is 6π units cubed. Hence, the correct option is:d.9/2 [tex]\pi[/tex]units cubbed.
For more question on area
https://brainly.com/question/25292087
#SPJ8
What is the solution to the initial value problem J²u(x, t) D.E.: J²u(x, t) Ət² = dx² I.C.: [u(x,0) = e-x² ut (x,0) = 0 Ans. u(x,t) = [e−(z−¹)² + e¯(x+t)²]. [infinity] < x
The solution to the given initial value problem is u(x,t) = [e−(z−¹)² + e¯(x+t)²]. [infinity] < x
Given Differential equation is J²u(x, t) Ət² = dx²I.
C is u(x,0) = e-x² and ut (x,0) = 0
We need to find the solution to the given initial value problem. The general solution to the given Differential equation is
u(x,t) = f1(x − t) + f2(x + t)
where f1 and f2 are arbitrary functions. We need to find the particular solution that satisfies the given initial conditions. Given intial condition,
u(x,0) = e-x² …………(1)
ut (x,0) = 0…………(2)
Let us find the value of f1(x) and f2(x) using the given intial condition,
From equation (1)u(x,0) = f1(x) + f2(x) = e-x²
Now, Differentiating f1(x) + f2(x) = e-x² w.r.t x, we getf1'(x) + f2'(x) = -2x ………..(3)
From equation (2)
ut (x,0) = f1'(x) + f2'(x) = 0
On solving the above two equations, we get
f1'(x) = x, f1(x) = ½x² + C1
and
f2'(x) = -x, f2(x) = ½x² + C2
Now, the particular solution is
u(x,t) = ½(x − t)² + C1 + ½(x + t)² + C2
u(x,t) = (x² + t² + C1 + C2)………….(4)
Using the initial condition u(x,0) = e-x² in equation (4)
e-x² = x² + C1 + C2
Now, we know that for large value of x, the term e-x² becomes negligible. So, C1 + C2 = 0 ⇒ C2 = -C1
Substituting C2 = -C1 in equation (4), we get
u(x,t) = [e−(z−¹)² + e¯(x+t)²]. [infinity] < x
The solution to the given initial value problem is u(x,t) = [e−(z−¹)² + e¯(x+t)²]. [infinity] < x.
learn more about initial value problem here:
https://brainly.com/question/30466257
#SPJ11
Lydia is a childbirth assistant. The first year of her career, she attended the births of 2 babies. Every year after that, the number of births Lydia attended has been double that of the previous year. After 6 years of working as a childbirth assistant, how many births has she attended in total?
Answer:24 or 4
Step-by-step explanation:
2x2=4 4x6=24 24 or 4
A horse 64 feet from the center of a merry-go-round makes 27 revolutions. In order to travel the same distance, how many revolutions would a horse 16 feet from the center have to make?
Please help me!!! I will try to mark brainliest if the answer is correct!
Answer:
I think the first is answer bcz 35+55=90 ..... 180-90=90
Qn) Consider an IQ test for which the scores of adult Americans are known to have a normal distribution with expected value 100 and Variance 324, and a second IQ test for which the scores of adult Americans are known to have a normal distribution with expected value 50 and Variance 100. Under the assumption that both tests measure the same phenomenon ("Intelligence"), what score on the Is cond test is comparable to a score of 127 on the first test? I plain your answer
The score on the second test that is comparable to a score of 127 on the first test is 131.
Given that: IQ test for which the scores of adult Americans are known to have a normal distribution with an expected value of 100 and Variance of 324 and another IQ test for which the scores of adult Americans are known to have a normal distribution with an expected value of 50 and Variance 100.
Let x denote the first test score that is comparable to a second test score of 127. Then, we have; (127 − 100) / 18 = (x − 50) / 10 (the z-scores corresponding to the scores)
Simplifying the above equation gives;
(127 − 100) × 10 = (x − 50) × 18
Solve for x as follows;
(127 − 100) × 10 + 50 = (x) × 18
Hence, x = 131
To know more about z-scores , visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30557336
#SPJ11
The score on the second test which is equivalent to a score of 127 on the first test is 4.332, or approximately 4.33 (rounded to two decimal places).
If X1, X2 are the IQ scores of the first and second tests respectively, we are given that X1 and X2 are both normally distributed. This means that their expected values and variances are known.
E(X1) = 100, Var(X1) = σ1² = 324E(X2) = 50, Var(X2) = σ2² = 100
We need to find the score, x on the second test which is equivalent to a score of 127 on the first test.
Therefore, we need to find
P(X1 ≤ 127) and then solve for x so that
P(X2 ≤ x) = P(X1 ≤ 127).
We know that
Z1 = (X1 - μ1) / σ1 and
Z2 = (X2 - μ2) / σ2 where μ1, μ2 are the respective expected values.
For a given probability P(Z ≤ z), we can find z using a standard normal table. Therefore, we can rewrite P(X1 ≤ 127) in terms of Z1 as follows;
P(X1 ≤ 127) = P((X1 - μ1) / σ1 ≤ (127 - μ1) / σ1) = P(Z1 ≤ (127 - μ1) / σ1) = P(Z1 ≤ (127 - 100) / 18) = P(Z1 ≤ 1.5)
The corresponding score on the second test, X2 can be found using;
Z2 = (X2 - μ2) / σ2 ⇒ X2 = σ2 Z2 + μ2
From the given values, μ2 = 50 and σ2 = 10.
Therefore,
X2 = σ2 Z2 + μ2 = 10 Z2 + 50
We need to find the value of x such that
P(Z2 ≤ x) = P(Z1 ≤ 1.5).
From a standard normal table,
we have P(Z ≤ 1.5) = 0.9332 and therefore,
P(Z2 ≤ x) = 0.9332 implies that
x = (0.9332 - 0.5) / 0.1 = 4.332.
Therefore, the score on the second test which is equivalent to a score of 127 on the first test is 4.332, or approximately 4.33 (rounded to two decimal places).
We are given
E(X1) = 100, Var(X1) = σ1² = 324E(X2) = 50, Var(X2) = σ2² = 100
We need to find x such that P(X1 ≤ 127) = P(X2 ≤ x).
Therefore, we find P(X1 ≤ 127) in terms of Z1 as follows;
P(X1 ≤ 127) = P(Z1 ≤ (127 - 100) / 18) = P(Z1 ≤ 1.5) = 0.9332
The corresponding value of X2, denoted by x can be found from
P(Z2 ≤ x) = P(Z1 ≤ 1.5).
From a standard normal table, we have
P(Z ≤ 1.5) = 0.9332 and therefore,
P(Z2 ≤ x) = 0.9332 implies that
x = (0.9332 - 0.5) / 0.1 = 4.332.
To know more about expected values, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28197299
#SPJ11
The ages (in years) of nine men and their systolic blood pressures (in millimeters of mercury) are given below. Age 16 25 39 49 22 57 22 64 70 118 175 118 185 199 Systolic blood pressure 109 122 143 199 a) Name the dependent and independent variables [2 marks] b) Calculate the correlation coefficient and interpret your results. [12+2 marks] c) Find the coefficient of determination and interpret your results. [2 marks] d) Develop the regression equation for the data set. e) Predict the blood pressure of a 50-year-old man
a) Dependent variable: Systolic blood pressure
Independent variable: Age
b) Calculations: xi (age) yi (Systolic blood pressure)xiyi (age × systolic blood pressure)xi^2 (age²)yi^2 (systolic blood pressure²)16 109 1,744 256 11,88125 122 3,050 625 14,88439 143 5,577 1,521 20,44949 199 9,751 2,401 39,60122 118 2,596 484 13,92457 175 9,975 3,249 30,62522 118 2,596 484 13,92464 185 11,840 4,096 34,22570 199 13,930 4,900 39,601∑x = 561∑y = 1,450∑xy = 61,059∑x² = 19,200∑y² = 249,141r = [9 (∑xy) - (∑x)(∑y)] / sqrt([9∑x² - (∑x)²][9∑y² - (∑y)²]) = 0.664- The correlation is moderate positive. As age increases, systolic blood pressure also increases.
c) R² = r² = 0.4416- 44.16% of the variability in systolic blood pressure is explained by age.
d) Regression Equation: y = a + bx where a = (y mean) - b (x mean) Using the means x mean = 62.3 and y mean = 161.1a = (161.1) - b (62.3)a = 33.62y = 33.62 + 1.083x
The regression equation is y = 33.62 + 1.083x.
e) Predicting the blood pressure of a 50-year-old man:y = 33.62 + 1.083xy = 33.62 + 1.083(50)y = 33.62 + 54.15y = 87.77
The predicted blood pressure is 87.77.
To know more about mean refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14532771
#SPJ11
For a, b, c, d € Z, prove that a - c|ab + cd if and only if a - cl ad + bc. 2. (a) What are the possible remainders when 12 + 16 + 20 is divided by 11? (b) Prove for every n € Z that 121 + n2 +16n+20
(a) The possible remainders when 12 + 16 + 20 is divided by 11 are 8 and 19.
(b) For every integer n, the expression 121 + n^2 + 16n + 20 is always divisible by 11.
In the first statement, we are asked to prove that a - c divides ab + cd if and only if a - c divides ad + bc. To prove this, we can use the property of divisibility. If a - c divides ab + cd, then there exists an integer k such that ab + cd = (a - c)k. Similarly, if a - c divides ad + bc, there exists an integer m such that ad + bc = (a - c)m. By rearranging the terms, we can express k and m in terms of a, b, c, and d. By substituting these expressions into the equation ab + cd = (a - c)k, we can show that ab + cd = (a - c)(ad + bc)m. Thus, proving the equivalence.
In the second statement, we are asked about the possible remainders when 12 + 16 + 20 is divided by 11. To find the remainder, we can calculate the sum as 48 and then divide it by 11. The quotient is 4 with a remainder of 4. Hence, 12 + 16 + 20 leaves a remainder of 4 when divided by 11.
To prove that 121 + n^2 + 16n + 20 is divisible by 11 for every integer n, we can use algebraic manipulation. By factoring the expression as (n + 4)(n + 4) + 16(n + 4), we can rewrite it as (n + 4)^2 + 16(n + 4). Now, we notice that both terms have a common factor of (n + 4). Factoring it out, we get (n + 4)(n + 4 + 16). This simplifies to (n + 4)(n + 20). Since both factors contain n + 4, we can conclude that the expression is divisible by 11 for any integer n.
To learn more about quotient
Click here brainly.com/question/5832512
#SPJ11
The mass of a species of mouse commonly found in houses is normally distributed with a mean of 20.9 grams with a standard deviation of 0.2 grams.
For parts (a) through (c), enter your responses as a decimal with 4 decimal places.
a) What is the probability that a randomly chosen mouse has a mass of less than 20.74 grams?
b) What is the probability that a randomly chosen mouse has a mass of more than 21.14 grams?
c) What proportion of mice have a mass between 20.8 and 21.04 grams?
d) 10% of all mice have a mass of less than grams.?
Given: The mass of a species of mouse commonly found in houses is normally distributed with a mean of 20.9 grams with a standard deviation of 0.2 grams.
a) The probability that a randomly chosen mouse has a mass of less than 20.74 grams is 0.2119.
b) The probability that a randomly chosen mouse has a mass of more than 21.14 grams is 0.1151.
c) The proportion of mice have a mass between 20.8 and 21.04 grams is 0.4495.
d) 10% of all mice have a mass of less than 21.15632 grams.
(a) The probability that a randomly chosen mouse has a mass of less than 20.74 grams.
Z = (X - μ)/σ, where X = 20.74, μ = 20.9, σ = 0.2.
Z = (20.74 - 20.9)/0.2Z
= -0.8P(X < 20.74)
= P(Z < -0.8)
Using standard normal distribution table, P(Z < -0.8) = 0.2119.
Thus, the required probability is 0.2119.
(b) The probability that a randomly chosen mouse has a mass of more than 21.14 grams.
Z = (X - μ)/σ, where X = 21.14, μ = 20.9, σ = 0.2.
Z = (21.14 - 20.9)/0.2
Z= 1.2
P(X > 21.14) = P(Z > 1.2)
Using standard normal distribution table, P(Z > 1.2) = 0.1151.
Thus, the required probability is 0.1151.
(c) To find the proportion of mice have a mass between 20.8 and 21.04 grams.
Z_1 = (X1 - μ)/σ
= (20.8 - 20.9)/0.2
= -0.5
Z_2 = (X2 - μ)/σ
= (21.04 - 20.9)/0.2
= 0.7
P(20.8 < X < 21.04) = P(-0.5 < Z < 0.7)
= P(Z < 0.7) - P(Z < -0.5)
Using standard normal distribution table,
P(Z < 0.7) = 0.7580
P(Z < -0.5) = 0.3085
Therefore, P(-0.5 < Z < 0.7) = P(Z < 0.7) - P(Z < -0.5)
= 0.7580 - 0.3085
= 0.4495
Thus, the required probability is 0.4495.
(d) 10% of all mice have a mass of less than grams.
Let the mass be X.
We have to find X such that P(X < k) = 0.1
Z = (X - μ)/σ, where μ = 20.9, σ = 0.2.
P(X < k) = P(Z < (k - μ)/σ)
0.1 = P(Z < (k - 20.9)/0.2)
0.1 = P(Z < 5k - 104.5)
Using standard normal distribution table, we get
5k - 104.5 = -1.2816k
k= 21.15632
Thus, 10% of all mice have a mass of less than 21.15632 grams.
To know more about normal distribution, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15103234
#SPJ11
Which is more, 8 yards or 24 feet?
Answer:
They are the same thing!
Step-by-step explanation:
8*3=24 (Because 1 yard is 3 feet)
24 = 24!
Answer:
8yd 24ft= 48ft 0.000000in
Step-by-step explanation:
What is the monthly payment for an $8,720 loan at 12.5 percent for 15 years?
$107.43
$10,617.40
$16,088.40
$19,337.40
The monthly payment for an $8,720 loan at 12.5 percent for 15 years is $312.84
How to calculate the compound interestThe formula for calculating the compound interest is expressed as:
A = P(1+r/n)^nt
Given
P = $8720
r = 12.5% = 0.125
n = 12
t = 15
Substitute
A = 8720(1+0.125/12)^180
A = 1.8622 * 8720
A = $56,312.74
Monthly payment = 56,312.74/180
Monthly payment = 312.84
Hence the monthly payment for an $8,720 loan at 12.5 percent for 15 years is $312.84
Learn more on compound interest here: https://brainly.com/question/24924853
7 2/3 +-5 1/2+8 3/4 solve.
Answer:
big shaq
Step-by-step explanation:
Let f(x) = 2x–8 and g(x) = x + 2. Find f(g(x)) and g(f(x)).
Answer:
g(f(x)) = 2x - 6
f(g(x)) = 2x - 4
Step-by-step explanation:
g(f(x)) = 2x - 8 + 2
g(f(x)) = 2x - 6
f(g(x)) = 2(x + 2) - 8
f(g(x)) = 2x - 4
Answer: g ( 2 x − 8 ) = 2 x− 6
Step-by-step explanation: MAKE ME BRAINLIEST!!!!!
Question is in picture
Answer:
the answer will be 14,3 ok but check it
is the equation y = x ^2 + 3 a function?
Answer: Yes it is
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Yes it is. Succese to The homework
The Kickers soccer team has 4 strikers, 6 midfielders, 7 full backs and 2 goalies. How many ways can they field a 2/4/4 team?
There are 3150 ways the Kickers soccer team can field a 2/4/4 team.
To determine the number of ways the Kickers soccer team can field a 2/4/4 team, we need to consider the different positions and the number of players available in each position.
For a 2/4/4 team, we have:
2 strikers
4 midfielders
4 full-backs
2 goalies
To calculate the number of ways, we can multiply the number of choices for each position:
Number of ways = Number of choices for strikers [tex]\times[/tex] Number of choices for midfielders [tex]\times[/tex] Number of choices for full-backs [tex]\times[/tex] Number of choices for goalies.
For the strikers, there are 4 available players, and we need to choose 2 of them.
This can be calculated using the combination formula, denoted as C(n, r):
Number of choices for strikers = C(4, 2) = 4! / (2! [tex]\times[/tex] (4-2)!) = 6
For the midfielders, there are 6 available players, and we need to choose 4 of them:
Number of choices for midfielders = C(6, 4) = 6! / (4! [tex]\times[/tex] (6-4)!) = 15
Similarly, for the full-backs, there are 7 available players, and we need to choose 4 of them:
Number of choices for full-backs = C(7, 4) = 7! / (4! [tex]\times[/tex] (7-4)!) = 35
Finally, for the goalies, there are 2 available players, and we need to choose 2 of them:
Number of choices for goalies = C(2, 2) = 1
Now, we can multiply all the choices together:
Number of ways [tex]= 6 \times15 \times 35 \times 1 = 3150[/tex]
For similar question on combination.
https://brainly.com/question/29501899
#SPJ8
I really need help please and thank you
Answer:
x = 8
Step-by-step explanation:
You can set up the equation 6/4 = 12/x and then cross multiply to solve for x
Two counters are selected at random from a bag containing 5 red counters and 3 blue counters.
Find the expected number of red counters selected.
Answer:
1.4
Step-by-step explanation:
Probability of selecting a red counter :
Number of red counter / total number of counters
5 / (5 + 3) = 5 /8 = 0.625
Probability of selecting a blue counter = 0.375
Let number of red counters :
0, 1 or 2
0 red counters :
Expected value = x * p(x)
0 + (0.625*1) + (0.390625 * 2)
0 + 0.625 + 0.78125 = 1.40625
Expected number of red counters = 1.4