Which of the following statements is not true if f(x) = 2x2 + x – 3 and g(x) = 2x3 + 3x2 – 2x – 3?

The equation that can be used to find other combinations of b and c is: b = k√a, where k is a constant of variation.

When a variable, such as b, varies directly with the square root of another variable, such as a, it means that there is a constant of proportionality such that the ratio between b and the square root of a remains constant.

In this case, we are given that b = 100 when c = 4. To find the equation that represents the relationship between b and c, we can set up a proportion using the given information:

b / sqrt(a) = k

Substituting the values b = 100 and c = 4:

100 / sqrt(4) = k

Simplifying:

100 / 2 = k

k = 50

Now we can rewrite the equation as:

b / sqrt(a) = 50

To find other combinations of b and c, we can rearrange the equation to solve for b:

b = 50 * sqrt(a)

Therefore, the equation that can be used to find other combinations of b and c is:

b = 50 * sqrt(a)

This equation states that b is equal to 50 times the square root of a. By plugging in different values for a, we can determine the corresponding values of b.

Know more about Plugging  here:

https://brainly.com/question/13137385

#SPJ11

Answer:

Sam's is nonsense and Kim's is sense

Step-by-step explanation:

why? because 1/3 and 1/6 are not equivalent. and 1/3 is greater. so therfore Kim's makes sense

Answer:

Answer:

2w+2l.

2(7)+2(5).

14+10.

24.

Answer:

1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Plug the coordinates into the slope formula.

y2 - y1/ x2 - x1

8 - 7 / 5 - 2

= 1/3

The slope is 1/3.

Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is 1.

When g(x) is 0, we need to add 4 to both sides, then divide each side by 4 to get the x by itself. We see that x is equal to 1.

0 = 4x - 4

4 = 4x

x = 1

#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)

The given partial differential equation is given by; Uz(x, t) + 2xut(x, t) = 2x

The Laplace transform of Uz(x, t) + 2xut(x, t) is given as follows; L[Uz(x,t)] + 2x L[ut(x,t)] = L[2x]sU(x,s) - u(x,0) + 2x[sU(x,s)-u(x,0)] = 2x/sU(x,s) + 2x/s^2 - 1(2x/s)U(x,s) = 2x/s^2 - 1 + sU(x, s)U(x, s) = [2x/s^2 - 1]/[2x/s - s]U(x, s) = s(2x/s^2 - 1)/(2x - s^2) = s/(2x - s^2) - 1/(2(s^2 - 2x))

By using the inverse Laplace transform, we have; u(x, t) = [1/s] * e^(s^2t/2x) - (1/2)sinh(t sqrt(2x)) / sqrt(2x)

Thus, the solution to the given partial differential equation is given as follows; u(x, t) = [1/s] * e^(s^2t/2x) - (1/2)sinh(t sqrt(2x)) / sqrt(2x)Where, u(x,0) = 1 and u(0,t) = 1.

The integral transform known as the Laplace transform is particularly useful for solving ordinary differential equations that are linear. It finds extremely wide applications in var-ious areas of physical science, electrical designing, control engi-neering, optics, math and sign handling.

The mathematician and astronomer Pierre-Simon, marquis de Laplace, gave the Laplace transform its name because he used a similar transform in his work on probability theory.

Know more about Laplace transform:

https://brainly.com/question/30759963

#SPJ11

The length of the radius of the cone is approximately [tex]6.74[/tex] feet.

To find the length of the radius of the cone, we can use the formula for the volume of a cone:

[tex]\[\text{{Volume}} = \frac{1}{3} \pi r^2 h\][/tex]

The concept used to find the length of the radius is the formula for the volume of a cone.

Given that the volume is [tex]640[/tex] ft³ and the height (h) is [tex]12[/tex] ft, we can substitute these values into the formula:

[tex]\[640 = \frac{1}{3} \times 3.14 \times r^2 \times 12\][/tex]

Simplifying the equation:

[tex]\[\frac{640}{12 \times \frac{1}{3} \times 3.14} = r^2\]\[r^2 = \frac{640}{12 \times \frac{1}{3} \times 3.14}\]\[r^2 \approx 45.45\][/tex]

Taking the square root of both sides, we find:

[tex]\[r \approx \sqrt{45.45} \approx 6.74\][/tex]

Rounding the answer to the nearest hundredth, the length of the radius is approximately [tex]6.74[/tex] feet.

In conclusion, the length of the radius of the given cone, with a volume of [tex]640[/tex] ft³ and a height of [tex]12[/tex] feet, is approximately [tex]6.74[/tex] feet (rounded to the nearest hundredth).

For more such questions on cone:

https://brainly.com/question/1082469

#SPJ8

Answer:

[tex]\frac{3}{1}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Put a 1 under it.

Answer:

5 + 5 + 3 × 7

Step-by-step explanation:

Correct me if I'm wrong.

The mean of the given data, 6, 6, -14, -14, 10, 6, -14, is approximately 0.857.

To determine the mean of the given data, we need to sum up all the values and then divide the sum by the total number of values.

The given data is: 6, 6, -14, -14, 10, 6, -14.

Sum up the values:

6 + 6 + (-14) + (-14) + 10 + 6 + (-14) = 6

Divide the sum by the total number of values:

6 / 7 = 0.857

Therefore, the mean of the given data is approximately 0.857.

To learn more about mean visit : https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ11

Answer:

it is 14

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C) 14

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume of a Sphere:

V = 4/3πr³

V = 4/3(3.14)1.5³

V = 4/3(3.14)3.375

V = 14.13

14.13 ≈ 14

Answer: they can make 240 bagels in 6 hours and the rate per hour is 40

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve the system of equations using Gauss-Jordan elimination, we'll start by writing the augmented matrix for the system. The augmented matrix is formed by combining the coefficients of the variables and the constant terms on the right side of each equation:

[1 -4 1 | 0]

[2 2 -1 | -4]

[1 -2 -1 | -5]

Now, we'll apply row operations to transform the augmented matrix into reduced row-echelon form.

Let's perform row 2 - 2 * row 1 to eliminate the x term in the second row:

[1 -4 1 | 0]

[0 10 -3 | -4]

[1 -2 -1 | -5]

Next, perform row 3 - row 1 to eliminate the x term in the third row:

[1 -4 1 | 0]

[0 10 -3 | -4]

[0 2 -2 | -5]

To make the second element of the third row equal to zero, perform row 3 - (1/5) * row 2:

[1 -4 1 | 0]

[0 10 -3 | -4]

[0 0 -1 | -3/5]

We can multiply the third row by -1 to make the leading coefficient in the third row positive:

[1 -4 1 | 0]

[0 10 -3 | -4]

[0 0 1 | 3/5]

Now, let's perform row 2 - 3 * row 3 to eliminate the z term in the second row:

[1 -4 1 | 0]

[0 10 0 | -19/5]

[0 0 1 | 3/5]

Next, perform row 1 + 4 * row 3 to eliminate the z term in the first row:

[1 -4 0 | 12/5]

[0 10 0 | -19/5]

[0 0 1 | 3/5]

Finally, divide the second row by 10 and simplify:

[1 -4 0 | 12/5]

[0 1 0 | -19/50]

[0 0 1 | 3/5]

Divide the first row by -4 and simplify:

[-1/4 1 0 | -3/5]

[0 1 0 | -19/50]

[0 0 1 | 3/5]

The resulting matrix corresponds to the system:

-1/4x + y = -3/5

y = -19/50

z = 3/5

Therefore, the solution to the system of equations is:

x = -3/10

y = -19/50

z = 3/5

Answer:

21

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

yes I guess a rectangle has opposite sides parallel parallelogram has opposite sides parallel a trapezium has opposite sides parallel a rhombus has opposite sides parallel if I'm wrong please connect me right away thank you.

Answer:

1.Yes, 2 pairs

2.Yes, 2 pairs

3.Yes, 1 pair

4.Yes, 2 pairs

Step-by-step explanation:

1.Each pair of co-interior angles are supplementary, because two right angles add to a straight angle, so the opposite sides of a rectangle are parallel. This means that a rectangle is a parallelogram, so: Its opposite sides are equal and parallel. Its diagonals bisect each other.

2.A parallelogram is a four sided figure where the opposite sides are parallel.

3.A trapezoid is a quadrilateral with one pair of opposite sides parallel. It can have right angles (a right trapezoid), and it can have congruent sides (isosceles), but those are not required.

4.Every rhombus has two diagonals connecting pairs of opposite vertices, and two pairs of parallel sides.

From the truth table, we can see that p->q and ¬p∨q have the same truth values for all possible combinations of truth values for p and q. Therefore, we can conclude that p->q is logically equivalent to ¬p∨q. In summary, we can see that p->q is logically equivalent to both !q->!p and ¬p∨q.

To prove the logical equivalence of the given statements, we can show that they have the same truth values in all possible cases. We'll use a truth table to demonstrate this.

p | q | p->q | !q | !p | !q->!p | p->q = !q->!p

-------------------------------------------------

T | T |   T  |  F |  F |    T   |      T

T | F |   F  |  T |  F |    F   |      F

F | T |   T  |  F |  T |    T   |      T

F | F |   T  |  T |  T |    T   |      T

From the truth table, we can see that for all possible combinations of truth values for p and q, the statements p->q and !q->!p have the same truth values. Therefore, we can conclude that p->q is logically equivalent to !q->!p.

Now let's consider the second statement, p->q. We can rewrite it as ¬p∨q using the logical equivalence of implication.

The truth table for p->q and ¬p∨q is as follows:

p | q | p->q | ¬p | ¬p∨q

-----------------------------

T | T |   T  |  F |   T

T | F |   F  |  F |   F

F | T |   T  |  T |   T

F | F |   T  |  T |   T

From the truth table, we can see that p->q and ¬p∨q have the same truth values for all possible combinations of truth values for p and q. Therefore, we can conclude that p->q is logically equivalent to ¬p∨q.

In summary, we have shown that p->q is logically equivalent to both !q->!p and ¬p∨q.

Learn more about combinations:

https://brainly.com/question/28065038

#SPJ11

To determine the solutions x⁵ + 2x³ = 3, you can use numerical methods or approximation techniques to estimate the values of x that satisfy the equation.

Let's solve the equation step by step to find the solutions.

Starting with the given equation:

log₃(x) + log₃(x² + 2) = 1 - 2log₃(x)

Now, let's simplify the equation using logarithmic properties. The sum of logarithms is equal to the logarithm of the product, and the difference of logarithms is equal to the logarithm of the quotient:

log₃(x(x² + 2)) = 1 - log₃(x²)

Next, we can simplify further by using the properties of exponents. The logarithmic equation can be rewritten in exponential form as:

([tex]3^{(log3(x(x^{2} +2)))} = 3^{(1-log3((x^{2}))}[/tex]

The base of the logarithm and the exponent cancel each other out, resulting in:

x(x² + 2) = [tex]3^{(1-log3(x^{2}))}[/tex]

Now, let's simplify the right-hand side by applying the power rule of logarithms:

x(x² + 2) = 3 / [tex]3^{(log3(x^{2} ))}[/tex]

Since  [tex]3^{(log3(x^{2} ))}[/tex]       is equal to x² by the definition of logarithms, the equation becomes:

x(x² + 2) = 3 / x²

Expanding the left-hand side:

x³ + 2x = 3 / x²

Multiplying through by x² to eliminate the fraction:

x⁵ + 2x³ = 3

This is a quadratic equation, which does not have a general algebraic solution that can be expressed in terms of radicals. Therefore, it is challenging to find the exact solutions analytically.

To determine the solutions, you can use numerical methods or approximation techniques to estimate the values of x that satisfy the equation.

Learn more about quadratic equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30098550

#SPJ11

The integral representation of the solution to the initial value ordinary differential equation (ODE) x'' - 8x' + 12x = f(t) with f(t) is given by x(t) = x₀ * δ(t) + x₁ * δ'(t) + ∫[a,b] G(t - τ) * f(τ) dτ.

The given ODE is a linear homogeneous second-order ODE with constant coefficients. To find the integral representation of the solution, we introduce the Dirac delta function, δ(t), and its derivative, δ'(t), as the basis for the particular solution.

To set up the integral representation for the solution of the initial value ODE x'' - 8x' + 12x = f(t), we first define the Green's function G(t - τ). The Green's function satisfies the homogeneous equation with the right-hand side equal to zero:

G''(t - τ) - 8G'(t - τ) + 12G(t - τ) = 0.

Next, we set up the integral representation as follows:

x(t) = x₀ * δ(t) + x₁ * δ'(t) + ∫[a,b] G(t - τ) * f(τ) dτ,

The integral represents the convolution of the forcing function f(τ) with the Green's function G(t - τ).

learn more about ordinary differential equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/14620493

#SPJ4

Answer:

Answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is B

In summary, using Z scores and a Z table, we can find that approximately 51% of respondents were married for the first time between the ages of 20 and 30, and an individual married for the first time at the age of 35 is in approximately the 97th percentile.

(a) To calculate the Z score for an observed age of 25.50, we use the formula Z = (X - μ) / σ, where X is the observed value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation. Substituting the given values, we get Z = (25.50 - 23.33) / 6.13 ≈ 0.36. The Z score tells us that the observed age is approximately 0.36 standard deviations above the mean. (b) To find the observed age associated with a Z score of -0.72, we rearrange the formula and solve for X: X = Z * σ + μ. Substituting the values, we get X = -0.72 * 6.13 + 23.33 ≈ 20.95. Thus, an observed age of approximately 20.95 corresponds to a Z score of -0.72.

(c) To calculate the proportion of respondents married between the ages of 20 and 30, we need to convert the age range to Z scores. The Z score for 20 is (20 - 23.33) / 6.13 ≈ -0.54, and the Z score for 30 is (30 - 23.33) / 6.13 ≈ 1.09. We then calculate the area under the normal distribution curve between these Z scores using a Z-table or a statistical software. This proportion represents the proportion of respondents married for the first time between the ages of 20 and 30.

(d) To determine the percentile rank for an individual married at the age of 35, we need to calculate the area under the normal distribution curve to the left of the corresponding Z score. The Z score for 35 is (35 - 23.33) / 6.13 ≈ 1.90. We then look up the corresponding percentile in a Z-table or use statistical software to find the percentage of the population with a Z score less than 1.90. This percentage represents the percentile rank for an individual married at the age of 35.

To know more about Z scores here: brainly.com/question/31871890

#SPJ11

After considering the given data we conclude that the creation of a satisfactory function with respect to the dedicated question is possible.

To make  a function where the domain is not a set of numbers and the range would be the set of whole numbers (1, 2, 3) and the theme of the function is breakfast, we can describe a function that takes in breakfast items as inputs and assigns a number from 1 to 3 to each item as outputs.
The domain of the function will be the set of breakfast items, and the range would be the set of whole numbers (1, 2, 3).
Here is an instance of such a function:
Function name: breakfastRanking
Domain: {pancakes, waffles, eggs, bacon, sausage, toast, bagel, cereal, oatmeal}
Range: {1, 2, 3}
Function definition:
breakfastRanking(pancakes) = 1
breakfastRanking(waffles) = 2
breakfastRanking(eggs) = 3
breakfastRanking(bacon) = 1
breakfastRanking(sausage) = 2
breakfastRanking(toast) = 3
breakfastRanking(bagel) = 1
breakfastRanking(cereal) = 2
breakfastRanking(oatmeal) = 3
For the function, we have assigned a ranking of 1, 2, or 3 to each breakfast item based on personal preference.
For instance , pancakes, bacon, and bagel are assigned a ranking of 1 because they are the favorite breakfast items, while waffles, sausage, and cereal are assigned a ranking of 2, and eggs, toast, and oatmeal are assigned a ranking of 3.
This function can be imperatives for deciding what to have for breakfast based on personal preference.
To learn more about domain
https://brainly.com/question/26098895
#SPJ4

Most likely (3,0)

If it’s reflected across the y axis, then it should be the opposite of (-3,0)

Answer:

An animal that eats dead animals or plants.

Step-by-step explanation:

Its lowkey the defintion lol

Answer:

x=9

Step-by-step explanation:

The probability that a randomly dealt 5-card hand contains 2 kings and 3 cards that aren't

kings is approximately 0.0399 or 3.99%.

To find the probability of randomly dealing a 5-card hand containing 2 kings and 3 cards that aren't kings, we need to calculate the number of favorable outcomes and divide it by the total number of possible outcomes.

The number of ways to choose 2 kings from the 4 available kings is given by the combination formula:

C(4, 2) = 4! / (2! * (4-2)!) = 6

Similarly, the number of ways to choose 3 non-king cards from the remaining 48 cards (52 cards total - 4 kings) is:

C(48, 3) = 48! / (3! * (48-3)!) = 17,296

Therefore, the number of favorable outcomes (hands with 2 kings and 3 non-king cards) is:

6 * 17,296 = 103,776

The total number of possible 5-card hands that can be dealt from a standard deck of 52 cards is:

C(52, 5) = 52! / (5! * (52-5)!) = 2,598,960

So, the probability of randomly dealing a 5-card hand containing 2 kings and 3 cards that aren't kings is:

P(2 kings and 3 non-kings) = favorable outcomes / total outcomes = 103,776 / 2,598,960 ≈ 0.0399

Therefore, the probability is approximately 0.0399 or 3.99%.

Learn more about probability at https://brainly.com/question/23477583

#SPJ11

Answer:

4.6

Step-by-step explanation:

3.. litteraly anything less than that

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

|4.7| = 4.7

Any number less than a positive 4.7 is less than |4.7|.

The sample variance is 10 and the standard deviation is 3.2.

Given data: 17, 10, 4, 8, 11

The sample size, n = 5

Mean (m) = ∑x / n

m = (17 + 10 + 4 +8 + 11)/5

m = 50/5

m = 10

x           x-m             (x- m)²

17      17-10 = 7         49

10      10-10 = 0        0

4       4-10 = -6         36

8       8 - 10 = -2        4

11       11 - 10 = 1          1

                                90

∑(x- m)² = 90

Sample variance, s² = ∑(x-x)² /(n-1)

Sample variance, s² = 90/(10 - 1)

                                 = 90/9

                                 = 10

Standard deviation (S) = √variance

Standard deviation (S) = √10 = 3.2

Learn more about variance and standard deviation on:

https://brainly.com/question/28383764

#SPJ1

Answer:

11.60

Step-by-step explanation:

If the cost of 4/5th a pound of apples is $1.16, and we need to find the cost of that of 8 pounds, then you start by finding how many 4/5ths of a pound are in 8 pounds. 8 dividided by 0.8 (the decimal form of 4/5) is 10. Taking that 10, you would multiply the original cost of $1.16, which would bring you to the total of $11.60.